Premise details
- Address
- 172 Maniapoto Street Otorohanga 3900
- Total beds
- 58
- Service types
- Dementia care, Rest home care, Geriatric, Medical
Certification/licence details
- Certification/licence name
- Beattie Community Trust Incorporated - Beattie Home
- Current auditor
- BSI Group New Zealand Ltd
- End date of current certificate/licence
- Certification period
- 36 months
Provider details
- Provider name
- Beattie Community Trust Incorporated
- Street address
- 172 Maniapoto Street Otorohanga 3900
- Postal address
Progress on issues from the last audit
This rest home has been audited against the Health and Disability Services Standards. During the last audit, the auditors identified some areas for improvement.
Issues from their last audit are listed in the corrective actions table below, along with the action required to fix the issue, its risk level, and whether or not the issue has been reported as fixed.
A guide to the table is available below.
| Outcome required | Found at audit | Action required | Risk rating | Action status | Date action reported complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surveillance methods, tools, documentation, analysis, and assignment of responsibilities shall be described and documented using standardised surveillance definitions. Surveillance includes ethnicity data. | Ethnicity data is not reported in surveillance of infections. | Include ethnicity data in infection surveillance. | PA Low | Reporting Complete | |
| Service providers shall engage with people receiving services to assess and develop their individual care or support plan in a timely manner. Whānau shall be involved when the person receiving services requests this. | Three resident files for resident who had been admitted within the last year did not have a documented initial interRAI assessment within set time frames (one hospital level and two dementia level of care). | Ensure that initial interRAI assessment is complete within set time frames as per policy. | PA Low | Reporting Complete | |
| Fundamental to the development of a care or support plan shall be that: (a) Informed choice is an underpinning principle; (b) A suitably qualified, skilled, and experienced health care or support worker undertakes the development of the care or support plan; (c) Comprehensive assessment includes consideration of people’s lived experience; (d) Cultural needs, values, and beliefs are considered; (e) Cultural assessments are completed by culturally competent workers and are accessible in all settin | Pain management and pain monitoring were not documented for one hospital and one dementia unit resident. Infection control precautions were not documented for one hospital level resident with a known infection. Behaviour management strategies were not individualised for one dementia level resident. | Ensure that pain management and pain monitoring are documented for residents with known pain. Ensure infection control precautions are documented for resident with a known infection. Ensure behaviour management strategies are individualised for residents. | PA Low | Reporting Complete | |
| Planned review of a person’s care or support plan shall: (a) Be undertaken at defined intervals in collaboration with the person and whānau, together with wider service providers; (b) Include the use of a range of outcome measurements; (c) Record the degree of achievement against the person’s agreed goals and aspiration as well as whānau goals and aspirations; (d) Identify changes to the person’s care or support plan, which are agreed collaboratively through the ongoing re-assessment and review | Four care plans for long term residents did not evidence that formal evaluations had been documented. | Ensure there is a documented evaluation of care six monthly and as needed. | PA Low | Reporting Complete | |
| Buildings, plant, and equipment shall be fit for purpose, and comply with legislation relevant to the health and disability service being provided. The environment is inclusive of peoples’ cultures and supports cultural practices. | Rooms 15 A is not yet suitable for hospital level care and needs improvement made: (i). Replacement of the french door with a window. (ii). Fitting of a ceiling hoist. | Ensure the required improvements are made to Room 15 A prior to using it for hospital level care. | PA Low | In Progress | |
| Where standing orders are used, the relevant guidelines shall be consulted to guide practice. | The standing order document does not reflect the issuer, the required clinical documentation to be completed, period for which the standing order applies and if countersigning is required/or not. | Ensure the standing order document meets the requirements of the Ministry of Health's Standing Order Guidelines. | PA Moderate | In Progress | |
| Planned review of a person’s care or support plan shall: (a) Be undertaken at defined intervals in collaboration with the person and whānau, together with wider service providers; (b) Include the use of a range of outcome measurements; (c) Record the degree of achievement against the person’s agreed goals and aspiration as well as whānau goals and aspirations; (d) Identify changes to the person’s care or support plan, which are agreed collaboratively through the ongoing re-assessment and review | One hospital level resident had no evaluations documented. | Ensure there is a documented evaluation of care six monthly and as needed. | PA Low | In Progress |
Guide to table
- Outcome required
The outcome required by the Health and Disability Services Standards.
- Found at audit
The issue that was found when the rest home was audited.
- Action required
The action necessary to fix the issue, as decided by the auditor.
- Risk level
Whether the required outcome was partially attained (PA) or unattained (UA), and what the risk level of the issue is.
The outcome is partially attained when:
- there is evidence that the rest home has the appropriate process in place, but not the required documentation
- when the rest home has the required documentation, but is unable to show that the process is being implemented.
The outcome is unattained when the rest home cannot show that they have the needed processes, systems or structures in place.
The risk level is determined by two things: how likely the issue is to happen and how serious the consequences of it happening would be.
The risk levels are:
- negligible – this issue requires no additional action or planning.
- low – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within a specified and agreed time frame, such as one year.
- moderate – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within a specific and agreed time frame, such as six months.
- high – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within one month or as agreed between the service and auditor.
- critical – This issue requires immediate corrective action in order to fix the identified issue including documentation and sign off by the auditor within 24 hours to ensure consumer safety.
The risk level may be downgraded once the rest home reports the issue is fixed.
- Action status
Whether the necessary action is still in progress or if it is complete, as reported by the rest home to the relevant corrective action manager.
- Date action reported complete
The date that the corrective action manager was told the issue was fixed.
Audit reports
About audit reports
Audit reports for this rest home’s latest audits can be downloaded below.
Full audit reports are provided for audits processed and approved after 29 August 2013. Note that the format for the full audit reports was streamlined from 16 December 2014. Full audit reports between 29 August 2013 and 16 December 2014 are therefore in a different format.
From 1 June 2009 to 28 February 2022 rest homes were audited against the Health and Disability Services Standards NZS 8134:2008. These standards have been updated, and from 28 February 2022 rest homes are audited against Ngā Paerewa Health and Disability Services Standard NZS 8134:2021.
Before 29 August 2013, only audit summaries are available.
Both the recent full audit reports and previous audit summaries include:
- an overview of the rest home’s performance, and
- coloured indicators showing how well the rest home performed against the different aspects of the Ngā Paerewa Health and Disability Services Standard.
Note: From November 2013, as rest homes are audited, any issues from their latest audit (the corrective actions required by the auditor) appear on the rest home’s page. As the rest home completes the required actions, the status on the website updates.
Audit date:
Audit type: Partial Provisional Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Certification Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Partial Provisional Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Surveillance Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Certification Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Partial Provisional Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Surveillance Audit