About us Mō mātou

About the Ministry of Health and the New Zealand health system. 

Regulation & legislation Ngā here me ngā ture

Health providers and products we regulate, and laws we administer.

Strategies & initiatives He rautaki, he tūmahi hou

How we’re working to improve health outcomes for all New Zealanders.

Māori health Hauora Māori

Increasing access to health services, achieving equity and improving outcomes for Māori.

Statistics & research He tatauranga, he rangahau

Data and insights from our health surveys, research and monitoring.

Premise details

Address
50 Mt Herbert Road Waipukurau 4200
Total beds
42
Service types
Medical, Rest home care, Geriatric

Certification/licence details

Certification/licence name
Kaylex Care (Waipukurau) Limited - Mt Herbert House
Current auditor
The DAA Group Limited
End date of current certificate/licence
Certification period
36 months

Provider details

Provider name
Kaylex Care (Waipukurau) Limited
Street address
4A Roberts Road Matakatia Whangaparaoa 0930
Postal address

This rest home has been audited against the Health and Disability Services Standards. During the last audit, the auditors identified some areas for improvement.

Issues from their last audit are listed in the corrective actions table below, along with the action required to fix the issue, its risk level, and whether or not the issue has been reported as fixed.

A guide to the table is available below.

Details of corrective actions

Date of last audit: 25 August 2023

Outcome required Found at audit Action required Risk rating Action status Date action reported complete
Fundamental to the development of a care or support plan shall be that: (a) Informed choice is an underpinning principle; (b) A suitably qualified, skilled, and experienced health care or support worker undertakes the development of the care or support plan; (c) Comprehensive assessment includes consideration of people’s lived experience; (d) Cultural needs, values, and beliefs are considered; (e) Cultural assessments are completed by culturally competent workers and are accessible in all settin The documentation describing the care the resident requires was not consistent with meeting the resident’s assessed needs. The residents’ strengths, goals and aspirations identified in assessment data do not align with the documented support required in the care plan. Early warning signs with a focus on prevention were not documented. Provide evidence the care plans describe residents’ individual needs, the strategies required to meet them, and that early warning signs with a focus on prevention are documented. PA Moderate Reporting Complete
Service providers shall develop and implement a quality management framework using a risk-based approach to improve service delivery and care. Not all internal audits have been completed as per the documented audit schedule, and audits not on the schedule have been completed. Where deficits had been identified on internal audits completed, these had not been followed up and no mitigation strategies were documented. Provide evidence that there is a relevant schedule for internal auditing in the facility, and that this has been adhered to. Provide evidence that there is a process in place so that deficits identified during the internal audit process are mitigated and this is documented. PA Moderate Reporting Complete
Service providers shall ensure there are sufficient health care and support workers on duty at all times to provide culturally and clinically safe services. There has not been an RN in the facility 24 hours per day/seven days per week (24/7) as required when the service is delivering hospital level services. There is a risk to health and safety when one RN, who is the FM, is covering night shifts in addition to their role across every night shift over the four-week period examined. Provide evidence that there is 24/7 registered nurse cover in the facility without the use of one RN across all night shifts over an extended period. Where this is not possible, provide evidence that the appropriate reporting mechanisms (communication with Te Whatu Ora and notification to the Manatū Hauora) have been employed to show how health and safety risks to residents and staff have been managed. PA Moderate Reporting Complete

Guide to table

Outcome required

The outcome required by the Health and Disability Services Standards.

Found at audit

The issue that was found when the rest home was audited.

Action required

The action necessary to fix the issue, as decided by the auditor.

Risk level

Whether the required outcome was partially attained (PA) or unattained (UA), and what the risk level of the issue is.

The outcome is partially attained when:

  • there is evidence that the rest home has the appropriate process in place, but not the required documentation
  • when the rest home has the required documentation, but is unable to show that the process is being implemented.

The outcome is unattained when the rest home cannot show that they have the needed processes, systems or structures in place.

The risk level is determined by two things: how likely the issue is to happen and how serious the consequences of it happening would be.

The risk levels are:

  • negligible – this issue requires no additional action or planning.
  • low – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within a specified and agreed time frame, such as one year.
  • moderate – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within a specific and agreed time frame, such as six months.
  • high – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within one month or as agreed between the service and auditor.
  • critical – This issue requires immediate corrective action in order to fix the identified issue including documentation and sign off by the auditor within 24 hours to ensure consumer safety.

The risk level may be downgraded once the rest home reports the issue is fixed.

Action status

Whether the necessary action is still in progress or if it is complete, as reported by the rest home to the relevant district health board.

Date action reported complete

The date that the district health board was told the issue was fixed.

About audit reports

Audit reports for this rest home’s latest audits can be downloaded below.

Full audit reports are provided for audits processed and approved after 29 August 2013. Note that the format for the full audit reports was streamlined from 16 December 2014. Full audit reports between 29 August 2013 and 16 December 2014 are therefore in a different format. 

From 1 June 2009 to 28 February 2022 rest homes were audited against the Health and Disability Services Standards NZS 8134:2008. These standards have been updated, and from 28 February 2022 rest homes are audited against Ngā Paerewa Health and Disability Services Standard NZS 8134:2021.

Before 29 August 2013, only audit summaries are available.

Both the recent full audit reports and previous audit summaries include:

  • an overview of the rest home’s performance, and
  • coloured indicators showing how well the rest home performed against the different aspects of the Ngā Paerewa Health and Disability Services Standard.

Note: From November 2013, as rest homes are audited, any issues from their latest audit (the corrective actions required by the auditor) appear on the rest home’s page. As the rest home completes the required actions, the status on the website updates.

© Ministry of Health – Manatū Hauora