Premise details
- Address
- 7 Nova Scotia Drive Waipu 0510
- Total beds
- 71
- Service types
- Rest home care, Geriatric, Medical, Dementia care
Certification/licence details
- Certification/licence name
- The Ultimate Care Group Limited - Alden Ranburn
- Current auditor
- BSI Group New Zealand Ltd
- End date of current certificate/licence
- Certification period
- 36 months
Provider details
- Provider name
- The Ultimate Care Group Limited
- Street address
- Level 2 111 Johnsonville Road Johnsonville Wellington 6037
- Postal address
- PO Box 425 Waterloo Quay Wellington 6140
- Website
- http://www.ultimatecare.co.nz/
Progress on issues from the last audit
This rest home has been audited against the Health and Disability Services Standards. During the last audit, the auditors identified some areas for improvement.
Issues from their last audit are listed in the corrective actions table below, along with the action required to fix the issue, its risk level, and whether or not the issue has been reported as fixed.
A guide to the table is available below.
| Outcome required | Found at audit | Action required | Risk rating | Action status | Date action reported complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buildings, plant, and equipment shall be fit for purpose, and comply with legislation relevant to the health and disability service being provided. The environment is inclusive of peoples’ cultures and supports cultural practices. | At the time of the audit there was no current building warrant of fitness. | Ensure that there is a current building warrant of fitness. | PA Low | In Progress | |
| Service providers shall ensure their health care and support workers have the skills, attitudes, qualifications, experience, and attributes for the services being delivered. | Not all caregivers that regularly rotate through the dementia unit have completed the required dementia standards within the timeframe documented on the contract. | Ensure the contractual requirements related to meeting the educational requirements of caregivers working in the dementia unit is met. | PA Low | In Progress | |
| Fundamental to the development of a care or support plan shall be that: (a) Informed choice is an underpinning principle; (b) A suitably qualified, skilled, and experienced health care or support worker undertakes the development of the care or support plan; (c) Comprehensive assessment includes consideration of people’s lived experience; (d) Cultural needs, values, and beliefs are considered; (e) Cultural assessments are completed by culturally competent workers and are accessible in all settin | (i). There are no detailed interventions in the management of a diabetic resident (including but not limited to) signs and symptoms of hypo and hyperglycaemia, management of hyperglycaemia and clear instructions on frequency of blood glucose monitoring. (ii). There is no behaviour care plan with detailed interventions for one dementia level care resident with behaviours of concern and requiring reassessment for a higher level of care. (iii). There was no initial care plan or short-term care pla | (i)-(iii). Ensure that there are detailed interventions in resident care plans as per identified risk to guide staff in the delivery of care. | PA Low | In Progress | |
| In implementing care or support plans, service providers shall demonstrate: (a) Active involvement with the person receiving services and whānau; (b) That the provision of service is consistent with, and contributes to, meeting the person’s assessed needs, goals, and aspirations. Whānau require assessment for support needs as well. This supports whānau ora and pae ora, and builds resilience, self-management, and self-advocacy among the collective; (c) That the person receives services that remov | (i). There was no documented ongoing monitoring and assessment for one hospital resident reviewed by a podiatrist and noted to have skin breakdown on their toes. (ii). There is no documented action taken by staff when the blood glucose level for a resident was above reportable ranges. (iii). One resident recently readmitted from hospital did not have comprehensive readmission assessment and follow-up by a registered nurse. | (i)-(iii). Ensure that there is documented follow-up when changes occur to resident health status, with action plans clearly documented to guide staff in delivery of care. | PA Low | In Progress | |
| Planned review of a person’s care or support plan shall: (a) Be undertaken at defined intervals in collaboration with the person and whānau, together with wider service providers; (b) Include the use of a range of outcome measurements; (c) Record the degree of achievement against the person’s agreed goals and aspiration as well as whānau goals and aspirations; (d) Identify changes to the person’s care or support plan, which are agreed collaboratively through the ongoing re-assessment and review | Four of the five files reviewed did not demonstrate that the residents or family/whānau/EPOAs are engaged and provide input in the development and review of the individual care plans. | Ensure that there is documented evidence in resident files of resident and / or family/whānau/EPOA involvement in care planning. | PA Low | In Progress |
Guide to table
- Outcome required
The outcome required by the Health and Disability Services Standards.
- Found at audit
The issue that was found when the rest home was audited.
- Action required
The action necessary to fix the issue, as decided by the auditor.
- Risk level
Whether the required outcome was partially attained (PA) or unattained (UA), and what the risk level of the issue is.
The outcome is partially attained when:
- there is evidence that the rest home has the appropriate process in place, but not the required documentation
- when the rest home has the required documentation, but is unable to show that the process is being implemented.
The outcome is unattained when the rest home cannot show that they have the needed processes, systems or structures in place.
The risk level is determined by two things: how likely the issue is to happen and how serious the consequences of it happening would be.
The risk levels are:
- negligible – this issue requires no additional action or planning.
- low – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within a specified and agreed time frame, such as one year.
- moderate – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within a specific and agreed time frame, such as six months.
- high – this issue requires a negotiated plan in order to fix the issue within one month or as agreed between the service and auditor.
- critical – This issue requires immediate corrective action in order to fix the identified issue including documentation and sign off by the auditor within 24 hours to ensure consumer safety.
The risk level may be downgraded once the rest home reports the issue is fixed.
- Action status
Whether the necessary action is still in progress or if it is complete, as reported by the rest home to the relevant corrective action manager.
- Date action reported complete
The date that the corrective action manager was told the issue was fixed.
Audit reports
About audit reports
Audit reports for this rest home’s latest audits can be downloaded below.
Before you begin
Before you download the audit reports, please read our guide to rest home certification and audits. The guide gives an overview of the auditing process and explains what the audit reports mean.
Full audit reports are provided for audits processed and approved after 29 August 2013. Note that the format for the full audit reports was streamlined from 16 December 2014. Full audit reports between 29 August 2013 and 16 December 2014 are therefore in a different format.
From 1 June 2009 to 28 February 2022 rest homes were audited against the Health and Disability Services Standards NZS 8134:2008. These standards have been updated, and from 28 February 2022 rest homes are audited against Ngā Paerewa Health and Disability Services Standard NZS 8134:2021.
Before 29 August 2013, only audit summaries are available.
Both the recent full audit reports and previous audit summaries include:
- an overview of the rest home’s performance, and
- coloured indicators showing how well the rest home performed against the different aspects of the Ngā Paerewa Health and Disability Services Standard.
Note: From November 2013, as rest homes are audited, any issues from their latest audit (the corrective actions required by the auditor) appear on the rest home’s page. As the rest home completes the required actions, the status on the website updates.
Audit date:
Audit type: Surveillance Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Certification Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Surveillance Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Certification Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Surveillance Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Certification Audit
Audit date:
Audit type: Surveillance Audit
