Chapter last reviewed and updated in November 2023. The updates made are under:

  • Managment of contacts 
    • Prophylaxis

A description of changes can be found at Updates to the Communicable Disease Control Manual.

Epidemiology

New Zealand Epidemiology

Diphtheria is caused by toxin-producing strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Rarely, diphtheria-like illness may result from infection with toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans.

More detailed epidemiological information is available on the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR) surveillance website.

Case definition

Clinical description

Respiratory diphtheria is characterised by infection primarily involving the tonsil(s), pharynx and/or larynx, low-grade fever, with or without an asymmetrical greyish-white adherent membrane of the tonsil(s), pharynx and/or nose. In moderate to severe cases there can be marked neck swelling (enlarged anterior cervical lymph nodes and oedema of the surrounding tissues), resulting in a ‘bull neck’ appearance. Toxic effects can arise, including cardiac and neurological symptoms (for example, myocarditis and neuropathies).

Cutaneous diphtheria is characterised by secondary infection of other skin conditions or chronic ulcers with a grey membrane. Cutaneous diphtheria can act as a reservoir of bacteria capable of causing pharyngeal disease. Toxic sequelae in cutaneous cases are uncommon. Other extra-respiratory presentations have also been described, including septic arthritis, conjunctivitis, and vaginal and external auditory canal infections.

Laboratory test for diagnosis

Laboratory confirmation requires isolation of diphtheria toxin-producing corynebacteria from a clinical specimen such as nose, throat and skin swabs.

Laboratories must be informed that the sample is from a suspected case of diphtheria as selective media are required.

Case classification

All isolates of C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans are notifiable until toxigenicity is determined, including cutaneous isolates. If the isolate is determined to be non-toxigenic (does not have the ability to produce diphtheria toxin), the case should be denotified.

  • Under investigation: A case that has been notified, but information is not yet available to classify it as probable or confirmed.
  • Probable: A clinically compatible illness that is not laboratory confirmed.
  • Confirmed: A clinically compatible illness that is laboratory confirmed or is epidemiologically linked to a laboratory confirmed case.
  • Not a case: A case that has been investigated and subsequently found not to meet the case definition.

Spread of infection

Incubation period

Usually 2–5 days, occasionally longer.

Mode of transmission

Contact with respiratory droplets or infected skin of a case or carrier or, more rarely, contaminated articles.

Unpasteurised milk has also been identified as a source of infection.

Period of communicability

Variable; usually 2 weeks or less, seldom more than 4 weeks. Effective antimicrobial therapy promptly terminates shedding.

Notification

Notification procedure

Attending medical practitioners or laboratories must immediately notify the local medical officer of health of suspected cases. Notification should not await confirmation.

All isolates of C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans are notifiable until toxigenicity is determined, including cutaneous isolates. If the isolate is determined to be non-toxigenic, the case should be de-notified. 

Management of case

Investigation

Obtain history of vaccination, possible contacts, travel, any cutaneous lesions or existing skin conditions and consumption of unpasteurised milk.

Ensure laboratory is aware of suspected case and has attempted confirmation from clinical specimen(s) by nose, throat and /or skin swabs, including toxigenicity testing of C. diphtheriae or C. ulcerans isolates.

To date, most isolates in New Zealand have been non-toxigenic. The extent of public health action while awaiting laboratory confirmation should be based on available information and the judgement of the local medical officer of health.

Restriction

Standard and droplet precautions for toxigenic pharyngeal diphtheria (and standard and contact precautions for toxigenic cutaneous diphtheria) until microbiological clearance has been documented.

Exclude case from early childhood service, school, work and close contact with previously unexposed people until microbiologically cleared. See Health (Infectious Notifiable Diseases) Regulations 1966.

Microbiological clearance

Two cultures from both throat and nose (and from skin lesions in cutaneous diphtheria), taken not less than 24 hours apart and not less than 24 hours after finishing antimicrobials, fail to show C. diphtheriae or C. ulcerans.

Treatment

All cases should be under the care of an infectious diseases physician or paediatrician. Diphtheria antitoxin is usually indicated before laboratory confirmation when there is strong clinical suspicion of diphtheria.

Immunisation

Case should be immunised in the convalescent stage because clinical infection does not always induce adequate levels of antitoxin.

Counselling

Advise the case and their caregivers of the nature of the infection and its mode of transmission.

Management of contacts

Definition

Regardless of vaccination status, all those with a history of close contact with a case of diphtheria caused by toxigenic C. diphtheriae or C. ulcerans (whatever the clinical presentation) during the 7 days before onset of illness or during the subsequent period of communicability should be considered potentially at risk. Risk is directly related to the closeness and duration of contact. Close contacts include:

  • household contacts
  • kissing and/or sexual contacts
  • students in halls of residence in the same corridor and/or sharing kitchen or bathroom facilities
  • child minders and children regularly being supervised by the case
  • health care staff (staff who have taken appropriate infection control precautions need not be considered contacts).

Depending on duration of contact and immunisation status of contact, others at risk of being contacts may include anyone:

  • regularly visiting the case’s residence
  • in the same workplace space, class or early childhood service room.

Contacts on forms of public transport are thought to be at low risk, especially if the journey is less than 8 hours’ duration.

Investigation

All contacts identified as at risk (regardless of immunisation status) should have nose and throat swabs taken for diphtheria culture. All close contacts should also have any skin lesions swabbed, regardless of whether there is clinically apparent infection. All contacts should receive follow-up checks for 7 days from the date of last contact. Such checks may be conducted daily, or the contact may be provided with an information sheet that includes a full and clear list of symptoms and a phone number to call if they become unwell. The primary health care practitioner should be kept informed of the management of contacts and laboratory results.

Restriction

Contacts who have a positive laboratory result should be isolated as if they are a case until proven bacteriologically negative.

Prophylaxis

All contacts, after cultures have been taken and regardless of immunisation status:  

  • A single dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin 
    • for contacts under 6 years of age, 600,000 units 
    • for contacts 6 years of age or over, 1.2 million units

or 

  • Oral Azithromycin, treat for total 5 days 
    • Children: 10 mg/kg as a single dose on the first day followed by 5 mg/kg/day on days 2-5. For children weighing >45 kg, dose as adult. 
    • Adults: Total dose of 1.5g taken as 500mg on day 1, then 250mg daily on days 2-5 or alternatively 500mg for 3 days 

 or 

  • Oral erythromycin, treat for 7 to 10 days  
    • children: 30 30-50 mg/kg/day in equally divided doses four times daily (every 6 hours). Can be also given twice daily if needed.  
    • adults 1,600 mg/day in equally divided doses 400mg four times daily (every 6 hours). Can be also given twice daily if needed.
  • Close contacts are recommended to receive chemoprophylaxis even if the index case has received eradication therapy. 
  • A pragmatic choice of dosage may be decided upon on further discussion including infection disease physicians and pharmacists. 

Contacts with a positive culture: Two follow-up cultures obtained at least 24 hours apart after completion of therapy. If cultures are still positive following a course of antimicrobial therapy, discuss further management with an infectious disease’s physician. The primary health care practitioner should be kept informed of the management of contacts and laboratory results. 

Immunisation

All close contacts should also be offered a complete course of vaccine or a booster according to the following schedule.

  • Fully immunised children up to and including 6 years of age who have only received three doses of diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine within the last 5 years: give one injection of DTaP-IPV.
  • Fully immunised individuals aged 7 years and older who have not received a booster dose of a diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine within the last 5 years: If aged 7–15 years, give one injection of Tdap; if aged over 15 years, give one injection of Td or Tdap.
  • Unimmunised individuals: Refer to the schedules in the Immunisation Handbook (Ministry of Health 2011).

Counselling

Advise all contacts to seek early medical attention if symptoms develop.

Other control measures

Identification of source

Check for other cases in the community. Notify doctors of the potential for outbreaks.

Disinfection

Disinfect all articles in contact with the case.

Health education

In early childhood services or other institutional situations, ensure that satisfactory facilities and practices are in place for hand cleaning; nappy changing; toilet use and training; food preparation and handling; and cleaning of sleeping areas, toys and other surfaces.

Reporting

National reporting

Ensure complete case information is entered into EpiSurv.

On receiving a notification, medical officers of health should immediately contact 0800GETMOH - CD option, and liaison staff at ESR, and complete the Outbreak Report Form.

Further information

References

  • Baker M, Taylor P, Wilson E, et al. 1998. A case of diphtheria in Auckland – implications for disease control. New Zealand Public Health Report 5(10): 73–6.
  • Bonnet JM, Begg NT. 1999. Control of diphtheria: guidance for consultants in communicable disease control. Communicable Disease and Public Health 2: 242–9.
  • Communicable Disease Report. 2000. Three cases of toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans infection. CDR Weekly 10(6). ISSN 1350-9357.
  • Farizo KM, Strebel PM, Chen RT, et al. 1993. Fatal respiratory disease due to Corynebacterium diphtheriae: case report and review of guidelines for management, investigation, and control. Clinical Infectious Diseases 16(1): 59–68.
  • Heymann DL (ed). 2008. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual (19th edition). Washington: American Public Health Association.
  • Miller LW, Bickham S, Jones WL, et al. 1974. Diphtheria carriers and the effect of erythromycin therapy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 6(2): 166–9.
  • Ministry of Health. 2007. Direct Laboratory Notification of Communicable Diseases: National guidelines. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
  • Ministry of Health. 2011. Immunisation Handbook 2011. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
  • MMWR. 1997. Case definitions for public health surveillance. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 46(RR10): 1–55.
  • Tejpratap SP, Tiwari MD. 2011. Diphtheria. In VPD Surveillance Manual (5th edition). 1 Chapter 1-1.
  • UK Health Security Agency (2014) Public health control and management of diphtheria in England: 2023 guidelines 
  • Wagner J, Ignatius R, Voss S, et al. 2001. Infection of the skin caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans and mimicking classical cutaneous diphtheria. Clinical Infectious Diseases 33: 1598–600.